<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:43:39 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Executive Search Blog</title><link>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>The 7 Habits of Spectaculary Unsuccesful Executives</title><category>Leadership</category><dc:creator>Peter D'Autry</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:08:50 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/2012/1/3/the-7-habits-of-spectaculary-unsuccesful-executives.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">324150:3400802:14420470</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericjackson/2012/01/02/the-seven-habits-of-spectacularly-unsuccessful-executives/">Forbes</a></p>
<p>1) They see themselves and their companies dominating their environment (warning sign: a lack of respect)</p>
<p>2) They identify so completely with the company/corporation that there is no clear boundary between their personal interests and their corporation's interest (warning sign: questions of character)</p>
<p>3) They think they have all the answers (warning sign: no followers)</p>
<p>4) They ruthlessly eliminate anyone who is not completely behind them (warning sign: executive departures/churn)</p>
<p>5) They are consumate spokepersons, obsessed with the company image (warning sign: blatant attention seeking)</p>
<p>6) They under-estimate obstacles (warning sign: excessive hype)</p>
<p>7) They stubbornly rely on what worked for them in the past (warning sign: constantly referring to what worked in the past)</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-14420470.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The assessment of strategic depth</title><category>Assesment interview</category><dc:creator>Peter D'Autry</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/2011/12/9/the-assessment-of-strategic-depth.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">324150:3400802:12976920</guid><description><![CDATA[One of the required traits for a senior leader is an ability to craft and execute strategy. In his book Good Strategy, Bad Strategy, Richard Rumelt describes how the task of the corporate leader is closely linked to the design and execution of good strategy. Strategy in his view is not a goal or a wish, but the outcome of an in-depth and straightforward appraisal of the problems and the challenges of a company, a process that culminates in where, why and how a series of actions should be taken. The result of such appraisal inevitably leads to a choice of specific action and focus that excludes alternatives and allocates resources to the action underlying strategic execution.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-12976920.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Tim Cook and the rise of the Chief Supply Chain Officer ?</title><category>Business Strategy</category><category>Technology</category><dc:creator>Peter D'Autry</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 19:59:08 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/2011/10/9/tim-cook-and-the-rise-of-the-chief-supply-chain-officer.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">324150:3400802:13137349</guid><description><![CDATA[In a recent WMS Software Advice blog post "Consumer-Driven Technology Creates the Need for a C-Level Supplychain Focus", Michael Koploy argues that the raising importance of supply chain management merits the creation of a C-level position with Supply Chain responsibility, as supply chain management can make or brake a company in today's globalized interconnected economy. He took the example of how Tim Cook, with a background in manufacturing and supply chain management rose through the ranks at IBM, Compaq and Apple to become CEO of the worlds most valuable company. Michael wrote me a mail to ask if I could share my thoughts on his article.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-13137349.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Recruiting and Astrology ?</title><category>Assessment interview</category><dc:creator>Peter D'Autry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:17:39 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/2011/7/20/recruiting-and-astrology.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">324150:3400802:12196840</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">A few weeks ago I had the pleasure to dine in Athens in the company the HR director of one of the larger Greek Technology companies. She confided she planned to leave, and was considering other employment alternatives. The reason behind her decision to leave was a peculiar request from an executive belonging to the company they just merged with.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This senior director pointed to the staple of CV's of Senior SW Developers she was reviewing on her desk, requesting her to select only people with Virgo and Leo zodiac signs so he could "achieve team coherence". I thought she was joking, but the look in her eyes confirmed this effectively happened.&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">5 years in this business and I assumed to have heard and seen it all. Obviously I did not.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-12196840.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Outsourcing recruitment for dysfunctional hiring</title><category>Candidate Placement</category><category>Recruitment Outsourcing</category><dc:creator>Peter D'Autry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/2011/6/15/outsourcing-recruitment-for-dysfunctional-hiring.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">324150:3400802:11241053</guid><description><![CDATA[During 2010 I worked with a multinational technology client filling several critical roles across Europe, varying in seniority from Account Managers to Senior EMEA Directors. The firm was growing ferociously fast, and needed to fill close to 200 positions across EMEA. This company has a highly visible brand, and is proud to have been nominated one of the best companies to work for by Fortune magazine some time ago.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-11241053.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>On Talent and the difference between Recruiters and Search Consultants</title><category>Assessment interview</category><category>Talent acquisition</category><dc:creator>Peter D'Autry</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:18:52 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/2011/4/23/on-talent-and-the-difference-between-recruiters-and-search-c.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">324150:3400802:8842641</guid><description><![CDATA[In 1964 Justice Potter Stewart tried to explain "hard-core" pornography, or what is obscene, by saying, "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced . . . but I know it when I see it . . . This quote, and the intent behind it, is well known as summarizing the irony and difficulty in trying to define obscenity. For at least fifty years, the Supreme Court has been struggling with defining what speech is "obscene".]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-8842641.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Collaboration and the quality of hiring managers</title><category>Executive Search Methodology</category><category>Human Resources Management</category><dc:creator>Peter D'Autry</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/2010/9/25/collaboration-and-the-quality-of-hiring-managers.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">324150:3400802:8778029</guid><description><![CDATA[The most significant factor contributing to the successful close of a search assignment is the collaboration between client and consultant. Collaboration captures all those elements in a client relationship that are conducive to a great placement. For the consultant, the main goal of client management is to achieve the highest degree of collaboration.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-8778029.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Managers and influence</title><dc:creator>Peter D'Autry</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:05:09 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/2010/9/11/managers-and-influence.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">324150:3400802:8842610</guid><description><![CDATA[The effective manager must have a high capacity to influence, which causes people to follow him and his organization without any need for pressure or coercion. A manager with a high degree of influence is someone with high leadership ability. My experience interviewing effective managers narrows the roots of influence down to:]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-8842610.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Relationship Accounting</title><category>Executive Search Philosophy</category><dc:creator>Peter D'Autry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:20:27 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/2010/8/11/relationship-accounting.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">324150:3400802:8522992</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span>Most consultants who receive their signed proposal back from the client believe they have earned the business. Nothing is further from the truth, because </span><em><span><span style="font-style: normal;">they have only earned the right</span> to earn the business</span></em><span>. They owe the client aleady from the start because they have not delivered yet; the client assumed a risk and feels they did the consultant a favor. Therefore, when one starts the job there is already a deficit. Missed delivery deadlines further increases the deficit, as do sloppy execution, slow response time, and so on... This goes until the client has enough and goes elsewhere.</span></p>
<p><span>Relationships have a balance sheet. Watch them closely and make sure there is a surplus and no deficit. How to do this? I once read a suggestion which sounded corny and obvious but encapsulated the whole essence:</span><em> make every client very happy every day</em><span>.</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-8522992.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>On empathy</title><category>Executive Search Consultant</category><category>Executive Search Evaluation</category><dc:creator>Peter D'Autry</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:18:16 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/2010/7/18/on-empathy.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">324150:3400802:8290893</guid><description><![CDATA[Empathy is a trait crucial for a Search Consultant, both in client and candidate contacts. It is "the" key to personal effectiveness. What empathy allows is :

1. Understand the character, values, perceptions and personality of individuals, and the context they're embedded in.

2. Build deep and meaningful relationships

3. Give an appropriate response to others]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.executivesearch101.com/journal/rss-comments-entry-8290893.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
